The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart show the household expenditure about housing, transport, food, health care and other services as percentage for Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
If we look carefully, %29 of Japan’s expenditure was other goods and service as the highest percentage while %6 of them was health care. And also, the highest expenditure in Malaysia was %34 for housing whereas the lowest expenditure was %3 for health care.
To continue with, if we compare between Japan and Malaysia, both expenditures were high by %24 and %27 for food and almost they are same. In addition, for the former had %20 about expenditure of transport and for the latter had %10. Japan’s housing expenditures was cheaper %13 than Malaysia.
To sum up, Japan spent much money for other goods and service while Malaysia spent much money for housing. It is very important health care but, surprisingly, both spent more less money for health care in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Hoangnhi | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | lordwind | 81 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | subashtimalsina112 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Muhammed_10 | 56 | view |
- The graph shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services- to the UK economy in twentieth century. 61
- -Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- -The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give opinions. 67
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 67
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'less' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: less
...alth care but, surprisingly, both spent more less money for health care in 2010.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, while, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04516129032 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6831574734 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.146592788 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.75 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153568760743 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878686558114 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725447987474 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125388609566 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823297092785 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.