The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
The pie chart compares the proportion of kinds of five different in France of energy production in 1995 and 2005. Overall, it can be seen that the lowest change was in the percentage of energy production to petrol energy.
In 1995, the most energy production was coal, representing at the time the coal production was high and it was still higher in 2005. At 29.63% gas was the second most energy production and rose not significantly to only 30,31% ten years later. Initially, petrol energy was a high number at 29, 27%. However, this figure decreased dramatically became 19.55%. It was the only energy production which was declined.
Less change was seen in the remaining two energy production. On the nuclear went up slightly to 10.10% in 2012. It rose by only 3.7%. Afterwards, on other energy production for ten years later at 9.10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jesslynindah | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Zulph_ | 56 | view |
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers, whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children. Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion. 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 36
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88194444444 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66397976615 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9888536147 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.9090909091 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0909090909 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227931981683 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955604600875 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109640684448 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185118234971 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106363315276 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.14 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.