The pie charts below show the different types of courses, which were followed by the students during the years of 1984,1994 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrate the ways of courses chosen by students in the given period of 1984 to 2004.
It is crystal clear that, in 1984, face to face courses are most popular was at 67%. Whereas, in mixed media courses and correspondence courses was at only at 13% and 20% respectively.
In 1994, the correspondence courses was still remained same. Whereas, only 2% of increase can be seen in the mixed media courses. However, in face to face courses there was a 13% of decrease and 11% of students choosed online courses.
In 2994, face to face courses can be observed at 40% followed by mixed media courses at 35%. While, correspondence courses was at 15% which was 5% less in online courses.
Overall, with the time of passage fewer choose face to face method, but the multimedia course was choose by most of the learner’s.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-22 | dhruv j patel | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-31 | Jazz Brar | 86 | view |
- The graph below shows the total births and the deaths in a European country from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and give comparison where relevant 87
- Some people think that government is wasting the money on the art and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. 61
- The pie charts below show the different types of courses which were followed by the students during the years of 1984 1994 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they donot need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- In some countries the number of people using bicycle main transport mode is decreasing even though his so beneficial why is this so how can people be encouraged to use more bicycles 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ndence courses was still remained same. Whereas, only 2% of increase can be seen in the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, still, whereas, while, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74324324324 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71917278918 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4113158037 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.0 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0743325746074 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434749110133 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436180242553 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577492018974 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539804825896 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.