The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007.
The given pie charts illustrate the information regarding 5 major factors which made students enroll at one UK university in the 2 years 1987 and 2007.
Overall, while the majority of students considered suitable degree courses important, a difference after 20 years was the tendency among them to want to be close to their parents.
According to the charts, 35% of the students studied at the university due to suitable degree courses in 1987, which was higher than the percentage of those who went to the university because of quality resources and sports/social activities by 14% and 16%, respectively. Much lower than these figures, quality of teaching and being close to parents only accounted for 15% and 10% of the reasons in 1987.
By contrast, two decades later, the proportion of the students going to the university because of proximity to parents experienced a considerable rise to almost a quarter, whereas that of those who sought sports and social activities remarkably dropped to as low as 6%. In comparison to the 8% of students prioritizing the quality of teaching of the university, twice as many students chose the quality of resource in 2007.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia 78
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Only government action can solve the housing shortage in big cities. To what extent do you agrre or disagree? 67
- In today s world private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07772020725 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9051975648 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4793472578 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.333333333 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25850115789 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123961485721 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916844389033 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15378137945 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978122740859 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.