The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the fundamental reasons for the students' decision to study at a specific UK university between 1987 and 2007.
We can observe from the pie charts that the degree courses that are appropriate are the most concerning reasons in both years. Meanwhile, the distance from parents' home to school was a matter of concern in 1987. Suddenly, it became a reason to study in a UK university in 2007.
Students choosing to study at universities in the UK to obtain a suitable degree course increased from 35% to 37% in 2007. However, the second reason was that in 1987 the quality of resources decreased from 21% to 17%.
Similarly, there has been a decline in active sports and social activities from 19% to 6%. This is a small set of information to choose a university in 2007. Besides that, students who prefer university near their parents' home have increased by 10% to 20%. Unfortunately, the number of students who prefer university because of the quality of teaching decreased from 15% to 8% at the end of the period.
- Task 1 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in country in 1985 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75690607735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77138879091 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546961325967 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6615828487 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260936476383 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116322480762 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937912445597 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190172345423 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767945360989 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.