Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
In many regions, it is very common to see bicycles and cars traversing the same lane. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
The fact that bikers and car drivers share a similar roadway while travelling leads to two main issues. Firstly, accidents occur frequently if cars and cyclists are moving in the same direction, which also means that the mortality rate could be higher. Automobiles are large and are able to run extremely quickly. When they cannot control their transport, they will kill people who travel by bike. Secondly, people who drive cars will feel uncomfortable when they share the same road with bicyclists. For instance, they have a meeting and have just 5 minutes to come to the company, but car drivers need to slow down and wait for bikers riding at their average speed.
In order to deal with those problems, there are a number of viable solutions to help tackle them. First of all, the authorities should set some strict rules for both cars and bikes. For example, they could limit the speed of transportation by requiring a maximum speed as low as 50 kph. Drivers will control their vehicles when they run at a low speed. Finally, the government needs to separate lanes for two vehicles. It will decrease accidents, especially between cars and bicycles.
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem, and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation.
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84765625 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54094581596 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2236110792 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7333333333 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0666666667 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178379488069 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534423220235 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437004800679 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939151171262 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312988010248 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.