Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
There is a controversial opinion about the case of cyclists and car drivers who are traveling on the same road. In this essay, I will outline several reasons for this and put forward some feasible measures to address this problem.
There is no denying that sharing the same road has an extremely negative impact on the travel experience of both motorists and cyclists as it can increase the mortality rate on these roads. Moreover, different types of transport have different speeds and automobiles tend to move much faster than bicycles. As a result, car drivers and cyclists may be at greater risk of a collision, and injury to both. For example, the increasing rate of serious accidents among cyclists in Viet Nam is due to riding on the same road as other vehicles. Therefore, the fact that two vehicles share the same road can cause inevitable accidents and threaten the safety of drivers.
In order to address this issue, there are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, the government should establish separate lanes for these two vehicles so that their different speeds will not bother each other as in aforementioned situations. Furthermore, the authorities should make traffic laws and severely punish those who break the rules or go in the wrong lane and the government should also arrange speed testing devices in places where both vehicles are moving to avoid traffic accidents
In conclusion, there are main contributors to the problem and several measures are suggested to put an end to the situation.
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 67
- Schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es are moving to avoid traffic accidents In conclusion, there are main contributo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03100775194 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68635690679 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6510257131 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.8 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246984840141 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961253941004 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661214948748 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135469114325 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738384936341 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.