Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
Nowadays, people can see cars and bicycles travelling on the same road. This can lead to some undesirable consequences, which can be resolved by some of the methods below.
All arguments stem from a variety of reasons, but here are two typical reasons: Firstly, because they have different speeds, it is easy to cause unnecessary accidents. Cars are always bigger than bicycles, so cyclists cannot keep up with traffic; they will be left behind or take risks trying to keep up with cars. Second, cars often encroach on the path of cyclists, so they do not have enough space to move freely, making it easy to get stuck in traffic. And because cyclists don't have review mirrors, they won't be able to see or predict the direction of the person behind them. Those things can cause casualties, material damage, and infrastructure damage, as an example.
One of the most effective ways to solve this problem is to create separate lanes for cars and motorcycles. That will create favourable conditions for the two vehicles to move at a more suitable speed, and it also helps to prevent the bicycle lane from being encroached on as before. In addition, using public transport is also a very effective way to reduce the number of vehicles on the road, which helps to make the air cleaner and less dangerous, creating a better society. clean. Governments can create policies to limit these risks.
In short, depending on the needs of each person, using different types of means. The most useful way to solve these problems is to create dedicated lanes for each type, and the government can encourage people to use bicycles because of their benefits.
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 73
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... consequences, which can be resolved by some of the methods below. All arguments stem fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... stuck in traffic. And because cyclists dont have review mirrors, they wont be able ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clean
...s dangerous, creating a better society. clean. Governments can create policies to lim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87544483986 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55366286091 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.783063618 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124879567878 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439583204849 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409114965485 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073339445194 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032202775325 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... consequences, which can be resolved by some of the methods below. All arguments stem fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... stuck in traffic. And because cyclists dont have review mirrors, they wont be able ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Clean
...s dangerous, creating a better society. clean. Governments can create policies to lim...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87544483986 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55366286091 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601423487544 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.783063618 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.384615385 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124879567878 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439583204849 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409114965485 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073339445194 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032202775325 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.