The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India
The graph depicts the information about the foods % consumed in the world, compared to China and India over the period. Overall, it was immediately apparent that there was a largest percentage of processed food consumed in the world including in China and India compared to other foods.
In 2008, the processed food had a greater proportion in the world, India, and China, with 41 %, 39%, 34% respectively, where the figure for the world was the maximum recorded. In China, fewer animal food was consumed, only at 19 %. While that in the world and India, food for animal about 26% and 27%, a much higher than In China.
On the other hand, In the world and India, the figure for Nuts and Seeds had smallest proportion of food consumption, accounting for 4%, 11% each. In addition, the consumption of vegetables in the world and China was higher, compared to India, with 29% (In the world, 32% (in China), and only 23 % (In India).
- no 11
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transportmodes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000. 78
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondaryschool types between 2000 and 2009. 84
- In some countries secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects In others children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career For today s world which system is appropriate 34
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...was immediately apparent that there was a largest percentage of processed food co...
^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the smallest'.
Suggestion: had the smallest
...nd India, the figure for Nuts and Seeds had smallest proportion of food consumption, account...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6975308642 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51369452856 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7687191195 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354420712405 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194838817038 0.103423049105 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691957997272 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271377451798 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121597499532 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.