The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and report the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the changes which have taken place in Grand Park from its opening in 1920 to today.
Overall, it is clear that the public park has experienced a variety of significant transformations in terms of recreational facitities and landscape areas with the exception of a rose garden in the northwest and the two main entrances which have remained unchanged.
In the north east of the park, there used to be a rose garden and a pond for water plants, but they have been substituted by a café and a children’s playground. Similarly, the glasshouse situated in the south east has been converted into a water feature. Another interesting development has been the introduction of an underground car park which is accessed through an entrance in the east where seats were put for relaxation.
The fountain located in the heart of the park has been knocked down to make way for a large square rose garden. Around the four sides of this new garden are rows of seats which used to be placed at different corners of the park. Also, the stage reserved for musicians to the left hand-side of the garden has been turned into a semicircular amphitheater for concerts. By contrast, both of the entrances to the north from Arnold avenue and to the south from Eldon street as well as the rose garden in the north west have stayed untouched.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-14 | thanhvan9893 | 67 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 67
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74887892377 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77693275883 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547085201794 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9528485269 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138624867708 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620302948691 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518852953447 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100300397045 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385967985585 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.