The plans below show a school library five years ago and the same library now.
The maps reveal the change of a school library during a five-year period.
It is clear from the maps that the biggest change that happened at the library was the replacement of four items. Additionally, more tables for studying appeared after five years.
Five years ago, library had two big bookshelves to the north and the south, but a row of bookshelves to the south were replaced by the desks for student's laptops. Moreover, there are also a construction of the desks for student who use laptop in the north-east corner now and replaced all the tables for computers. Classroom and library office were demolished to make way for the recording studio in the north-west area and conference room in south-east corner.
In the next five years, the meeting is room still remaining, while, the studying tables at the center of the library is widening more than four tables. Borrowing and returning desk is divided in two rooms in the south-west corner at the moment.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 56
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 84
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 78
- The table below shows the percentages of people joining in seven different sports in a European country from 1999 to 2009. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89696969697 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62609634283 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0951433714 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220548272399 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1056949706 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920937914608 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159387844647 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889356637693 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.