The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person
at an Australian university.
Two diagrams below depicts distinguishable major differences in student rooms’ dispositions of an Australian university in relation to the number of students.
On a whole, spaces for one student appear simpler, cheaper and more comfortable but less convenient than those for two students. More than that, the area of the former in design is quite smaller than that of the latter.
The surrounding area of two types of room has the same length with 6 meters; however, a two-person room is nearly 2 meters wider than a one-person room. Clearly, all the fundamental necessities like bathroom, study desk, bed are well equipped but just different in number. Particularly, while the two-person room owns two beds and study desks both positioned separately by cupboards, the one-person room is laid out with one study desk behind a bed that create a free space in the middle of the room. Other household appliances like sink, stove, microwave in both types are arranged neatly together in the kitchen corner with the purpose of economizing the space of rooms. It can be seen easily that a couple of table and chairs that are found next to the entrance of the two-person rooms are eliminated from the furniture of the one-person room. By those arrangements mentioned above, it can be understood that student room of two people cost more highly than that for one person with only 200 dollars per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | 10diemcute | 78 | view |
- It is true that in some countries grandparents play a significant role in bringing up children This trend has both positive and negative sides Let s look at the positive side first 78
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent d 85
- As mass communication and transport continue to grow societies are becoming more and more alike leading to a phenomenon known as globalization Some people fear that globalization will inevitably lead to the total loss of cultural identity To what extent d 56
- Foreign language instruction should begin in kindergarten Discuss 84
- Beside a lot of advantages some people believe that the Internet creates more problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: different
...dy desk, bed are well equipped but just different in number. Particularly, while the two-person roo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun table seems to be countable; consider using: 'a couple of tables'.
Suggestion: a couple of tables
...ce of rooms. It can be seen easily that a couple of table and chairs that are found next to the e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76521757699 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7225163881 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.444444444 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434025497726 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173196314337 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125906285651 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275030993847 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790074060503 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: different
...dy desk, bed are well equipped but just different in number. Particularly, while the two-person roo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun table seems to be countable; consider using: 'a couple of tables'.
Suggestion: a couple of tables
...ce of rooms. It can be seen easily that a couple of table and chairs that are found next to the e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95744680851 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76521757699 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587234042553 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7225163881 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.444444444 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434025497726 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173196314337 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125906285651 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275030993847 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790074060503 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.