The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
Given are the two maps depicting a little theater’s layout arrangement in 2012 compared to itself 2010.
Perceptibly, the mentioned facility, to home more services and enlarge the stage, was significantly reconstructed.
Regarding the 2010 site map, the theater could be accessed from the southern main entrance, from where a café, an admin office, and a ticket office could easily be seen on each side of the gate. In the interim, the auditorium was at the center of the building, which contains multiple seats for theater enrollers. Additionally, on the top of the performing area, there was a stage, which was in front of the Media area and adjacent to the storage.
The ensuing two years brought a significant transformation in the building’s design. The theater was extended towards the west to make way for newly-erected restaurants, which the admin office was relocated next to. Simultaneously, the former café was demolished to give room for the ticket office, and the old media area was turned into a narrower hall because of the extent of the stage. In terms of the aforementioned storage, which was moved to a newly-expanded area on the top right of the flat, it was redesigned for media purposes and taking showers nearby.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why do people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting a little theater...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04854368932 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03057284351 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582524271845 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4483868712 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.555555556 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853143623348 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414858079758 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621281651875 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732579666985 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778156673298 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.