The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now.

Essay topics:

The plans show a school library 5 years ago and the same library now.

The maps illustrate the differences in the layout of a school library over a 5-year period.
Overall, the configuration of the library has become more space-effective. The main difference is the resizing and the establishment of various facilities and rooms, while the meeting room and a bookshelf remained intact.
In the south-west of the library, there are 2 separated borrowing and returning sections instead of 1 joined desk. The meeting room undergone no change while the conference room has replaced the classroom in the West of the platform.
Some renovations could also be observed in the remaining area. In the center of the library, 2 more studying tables has been installed and all 6 of them were divided into smaller private space to increase the concentration of students. On both side of the studying section were 2 long bookshelves. However, while the one at the top kept its location, the other has been converted into student’s laptop desks. This transformation is also seen in the North Eastern area, with the vanishing of the computer’s desks. Besides, the conference hall has been erected in the bottom right corner of the plan at the expense the library office.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-09-09 Ahmad_off 84 view
2024-09-08 mrsaidovs@mail.ru 70 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
2024-08-16 Saul 67 view
Essays by user vlchi_02 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11734693878 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06382117759 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59693877551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4880143188 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12466122997 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493310620182 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858383202464 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975354727534 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980690809013 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.