The proportion of adult who owned digital devices in the USA from 2004 to 2015.
The change in the ownership of four different digital gadgets in the US from 2004 to 2015 is displayed in the line graph, shown in percentage.
Overall, desktop or laptop was the first launched and the most popular device owned by American. Furthermore, the popularity of all gadgets increased year-to-year, and that of personal-computer-based device only experienced a slight upward trend.
Initially, laptop or desktop had been well-known in the US with the proportion of users in about seven in ten, then that of owners remained the highest. When it comes to e-book readers, these had been released to American by 2008, sharing the same rate of ownership with tablets in 2010 at below one in ten. By 2012, smartphone had been recognized in that nation, being the second biggest percentage at around a third.
Eventually, the vast majority of users was still dominated by those having either laptop or desktop, increasing at almost three fifths. Turning to cellphone, this gadget gained the popularity of owners, with a gap of the maximum data recorded at one in twentieth. Lastly, while people using tablet grew at nearly a half, those utilizing digital-book reader inclined to be below a fifth.
- The bar chart illustrates the percentage of businesses in the UK who had a social media presence from 2012 to 2016 84
- Many people are choosing to live in the cities To what extent do the benefits of living in cities outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer You should give reasons for your answer using your own ideas and experience 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, second, so, still, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08080808081 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98960891304 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641414141414 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.8175122009 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117041209343 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469310023396 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627054390473 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827420536991 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726020882387 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.