Some people believe that is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings as compared to an horizontal city with fewer tall buildings Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people believe that is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to an horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is irrefutable that nowadays there is a tendency of shifting to big cities with the purpose of settling down and start a new job. These cities, which are the most hunted for this purposes, are mainly comprised of multistorey buildings and I agree, whereas horizontal cities are left behind, in terms of people's preferences. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints about the matter before putting forth my opinion.
On the one hand, there are countless benefits of being employed and living in a vertical city. Firstly, you have the opportunity to work in a corporation which is more likely to be located in a skyscraper rather than in a small building, as compared to a horizontal city. Take the example of Sony Company' headquarter in Singapore, which is a metropolitan city and where virtually all large companies are located within tall establishments. Furthermore, there is a higher likelihood for one to find accommodation in a multistorey building, which is most definitely state-of-the-art and has incorporated the latest technology, providing one with a better standard of living.
On the other hand, a sizeable number of such tall establishments gathered in a city means a higher density population which leads to overcrowding, in comparison with just a few spreaded within a horizontal city. In other words, the city would deal with a burgeoning population and its detrimental effects on citizens' physical and mental health. For instance, residents will have to deal with traffic congestion and increased pollution, which will most definitely have some dire consequences for their wellbeing.
To conclude, although there are merits and demerits of living in a vertical city, I strongly opine that the drawbacks are far fewer than the benefits you can get, namely having a better quality of life and a well-paid job in a multinational corporation.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (6 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-18 sivasankar 84 view
2019-11-07 Luna Qian 74 view
2019-01-15 el-naz 78 view
Essays by user marta :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e cities, which are the most hunted for this purposes, are mainly comprised of multi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: ENTIRELY_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mainly composed of'?
Suggestion: mainly composed of
... the most hunted for this purposes, are mainly comprised of multistorey buildings and I agree, whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed of multistorey buildings and I agree, whereas horizontal cities are left behin...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 303.0 196.424390244 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17161716172 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14533053301 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 283.868780488 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8274709322 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5454545455 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240948396792 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817410383658 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255334178865 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128800819832 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034777058662 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 40.7170731707 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.