table
The bar charts compare the percentage of young people who attend in higher education in 4 different countries in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
It is clear that there were two other trends occurred in the given period, While, in country A and D the amount of students going to college were higher compared to the others. In contrast, country B had the lowest percentage of college students.
According to the charts, the figures in country D hit the highest point at all stages with around 60% in 2000, nearly 65% and almost 80% in 2005 and 2010 respectively. The similar pattern can be seen from country A and the upward one came from country B and C.
In 2000, the proportion for the first 2 countries both started off at nearly 40% undergraduate student. And then the number of country A rose up to almost 50% in 2005 and then rocketed to around 58% in 2010, On the other hand, the figure for country B and C experienced the same tendency.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-15 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 86
- table 11
- the table below gives information about the values NZ of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to the university in order to travel or to work Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 64
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lowest percentage of college students. According to the charts, the figures in ...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he upward one came from country B and C. In 2000, the proportion for the first 2 ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47953216374 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5087242188 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.877372001 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.