The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
Table show the date of an investigation on an Average distant moved on 8 different type of transportation mode and total, in England during 1985 to 2000. Most factor of variable had been raised so that on the whole distance exposed to increasing too. Walking, Bicycle and Local bus had been increased since 1985 to 2000 while Car, Long distant Bus, Train, Taxi and other type had been decreased in the same interval. In other view totally movement for this 15 years grown from 4740 to 6475 mile.
For both years, Car had the maximum mode and the most amount of growing belong to it too. Although in 1985 taxi had the least distance, in 2000 bicycle was at the bottom of the list. The highest and lowest percentage change happened for taxi and local bus respectively. In 1985 local bus and other type was in top factor of transition in order after 15 years train using was become as one of the important mode.
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. 67
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour. Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
- Some expert believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what way has technology affected the type of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52727272727 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3551986146 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.299380799 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.375 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146032127256 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629202614769 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058140899588 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117695329472 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00225741092647 0.0819641961636 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.