The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the details regarding about date opened, Kilometres of route and Passenger per years of underground railway systems in six different cities.
In general terms, the under ground railway systems in different cities vary a lot of in the size of systems.
It is clear from the table chart show that London has the oldest underground railway systems among the six cities, it was opened in the year 1863. Paris is the second oldest which it was opened 1900. And next the underground railway systems of cities was opened relatively Tokyo(1972), Washington DC (1976), Kyoto( 1981), Los Angeles(2001). Los Angeles has the newest underground railway systems and was only opened in the year 2001. In terms of Kilometres of route, London has the largest underground railway systems in all six cities (total 394 km), which nearly twice as large as the systems in Paris and Tokyo ( 199 km and 155 km respectively) while Kyoto has the smallest systems ( only 11 km)
The table chart also show that Tokyo which has 155 km of route but has the largest the number of passenger per year (1127 millions). the Paris has the second largest the number of passenger (1191 million passenger per years). In contrast, Kyoto which has the smallest the number of passenger per years ( 45 million passengers).

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-11 Adeola Nafisat 61 view
2019-11-23 Nivedha_palani 78 view
2019-11-22 marin123 78 view
2019-11-22 marin123 61 view
2019-11-07 lunanguyen0701 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... large as the systems in Paris and Tokyo 199 km and 155 km respectively while Kyo...
^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely while Kyoto has the smallest systems only 11 km The table chart also show th...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...er of passenger per year 1127 millions. the Paris has the second largest the number...
^^^
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allest the number of passenger per years 45 million passengers.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82648401826 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45057053962 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438356164384 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.1583014862 43.030603864 216% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171609167518 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084049320449 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744513651516 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115491705813 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798656391684 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.