the table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992,2002 and 2012
Given is the table revealing the amount of food consumed per person weekly in a particular European country from 1992 to 2012
Overall, it is immediately apparent that the consumption of vegetables was the largest part of people's diet in all 3 years, whereas cheese was the smallest consumption, Additionally, the trends remained the same over the period.
As can be seen from the graph, the number of vegetable consumption recorded an exponential growth by 2140 grams in 1992 and 2022 grams in 2012. However, during the following years, meat consumption fluctuated slightly which rose gradually to 1211 in 2002 and then dropped sharply at 1132 over the next few years.
Turning to other remaining groups, it is noticeable that wheat, bean, and cheese were generally experienced an upward trend between 1992 and 2002 that reaching a peak of 977, 590, and 125 grams, respectively. Furthermore, after the consumption of cheese climbed sharply to 125 grams in 2002, it then stayed constant at 125 grams until the end of the period
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected 3 regions of the world during the 1990s 84
- the table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 84
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 73
- the charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 51
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02923976608 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76675560209 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649122807018 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8451647218 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.0 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263704382867 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118120683249 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0929383076463 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177180190345 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177295703635 0.0819641961636 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.