The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS Academic paper in 2003
The table presents the information of the average band scores of IELTS module from assorted countries in the years of 2003.
Overall, it is noticeable that the majority of students achieved the highest average scores in speaking skill. However, Hindi was the nation standing the first position in overall band scores amongst 4 selected countries in 2003.
Regarding the table in more details, we can see that, Hindi was the leading nation in band score in listening, writing and speaking skill, with the figure for 6.78, 6.38 and 6.86 consecutively. By contrast, the fist ranking in average band scores in IELTS reading skill belonged to Spain, at approximately 6.5. Interestingly, Malayalam and Russian candidates acquired the same scores in reading module, at nearly 6.2
Nevertheless, Spain ranked the lowest position in listening skill result, at about 6.3, while the lowest speaking band score was found in Malayalam, at roughly 6.5. On the other hand, students in Russia achieved the lowest overall result amongst 4 nations given, at nearly 6.38.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-07-24 | Tommy_aquarius | 93 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Smoking is banned is certain places so the mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- When people move to a new country, they should accept the local culture as their own. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- The leaders or directors of organizations are often older people But some people say that young people can also be a leader What do you think 83
- The table below shows the average band scores for students from different language groups taking the IELTS Academic paper in 2003 93
- Scientist and Tourist travel to remote natural environments, such as South Pole. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 36
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, regarding, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29585798817 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64947394683 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585798816568 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 150.171368776 43.030603864 349% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.0 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8 5.23603664747 264% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236471618102 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153776700415 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07949442105 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175618811144 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906333134967 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.