The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods (wheat, maize, rice) by people in four different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table depicts the calories in three daily products like rice, wheat, and maize consumed by the citizens in four nations: Cambodia, Poland, Egypt, and Mexico.
Overall, in the four mentioned countries, while the Cambodians devoured calories in rice the most, the Egyptians ranked first in wheat consumption, and the Mexicans utilized calories in maize more than four other nations.
To begin with, the rice utilization in Cambodia was 1445 calories per person per day, doubled the one in Egypt with 501 calories. Mexicans’ consumption ranked third out of the four mentioned countries, with 57 calories of rice consumed, lower than 500 times the Egyptians' expenditure, followed by the figure in Poland, with only 19 calories of rice consumed.
In the wheat expenditure, the Egyptians absorbed most of the four nations, with 1095 calories, higher than 230 calories than the figure in Poland. Mexico and Cambodia people expended 275 and 18 calories of wheat, respectively. Furthermore, 1083 calories of maize were consumed by the Mexicans, which doubled the figure of Egypt, with 578 calories. While Cambodians devoured 103 calories of maize, approximately 600 calories lower than the Egyptians, no citizen in Poland consumed maize.
- The civic centre will be planned to change There are two maps one is the existing and the other is the plan for new Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and compare the two maps 67
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 20
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 42
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, third, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41237113402 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74534746872 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4763098819 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116970791655 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661383564242 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510897199841 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999565393537 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455818152211 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.