The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1,000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000.
The table demonstrates how many motor vehicles were used among 1000 citizens in 8 different nations between 1990 and 2000.
Overall, Luxembourg had the highest figure at the beginning of this period, but it was Brazil which showed the biggest number of motorbikes in 2000. However, the number of motorcycles in Cambodia was the lowest throughout this duration.
It was estimated in 1990 that Jordan's population used 50 motor vehicles per 1000 inhabitants, a reduction of 18 toward Chile's. However, in 2000 Chile recorded a higher value than Jordan, which was about 69 motorcycles. Both Luxembourg and New Zealand had almost identical numbers of motorbikes, 548 and 531, respectively. There was a slight increase in motorcycles used in New Zealand, whereas Luxembourg showed a steady increase of 728 vehicles registered.
According to the table, Cambodians using motorbikes were the lowest with a figure of 1 motor vehicle between 1990 and 2000. There was a gradual decrease in motorbikes used by the Bahamas' people from 235 in 1990 to 187 in 2000. The 2 remaining countries showed nearly identical values in 1990. However, in 2000 the figure of this transportation in Brazil was approximately double Romania’s value.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- Now many people spend less and less time at home What are the causes for this What are the effects of this on individuals and on the society 56
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 73
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26530612245 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93799592834 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7929958794 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8181818182 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274794526338 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108345143604 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627629163001 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1743708674 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442597442781 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.