The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

Essay topics:

The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.

The table illustrates the number of people that visited the museum the year before and the year after the renovation of Ashdown, while the pie chart shows the survey feedback from the tourist about their experience. These responses were recorded on the scale of very satisfied to very dissatisfied and including no response.

Overall, around 18000 more people visited after redecorating the place than before (74000). Furthermore, the majority of the crowd that’s visited before making the changes left dissatisfied from the tour and whereas minority went very dissatisfied. However, after renovating the museum most of the visitors commented to be satisfied and a very small number marked to be very dissatisfied. Lastly, only 5% subjects handed the survey unmarked
.
Before changing the infrastructure a minority of 15% were very contained and almost a third was happy for their trip. Moreover, a significant number of people (40%) were unhappy; in addition, only one in ten was extremely uncontained.

On the other hand, after redesigning the Ashdown museum the similar amount of visitors that disliked the visit before stated liking it later, following that the tourist that enjoyed the visit the most increased by a fifth. Consequently, the population of travelers that were highly dissatisfied from the trip reduced to one in twenty and less than a fifth complained unpleased.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 Pham Mai Nguyet 73 view
2020-01-27 mone49 73 view
2020-01-10 ppatel 67 view
2020-01-10 ppatel 67 view
2020-01-10 ppatel 67 view
Essays by user Simran18 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 5% subjects handed the survey unmarked . Before changing the infrastructure a m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, third, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3698630137 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86556933319 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.139904268 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283952249908 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101102158888 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924995747621 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170517065729 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782928726303 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.