The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates how many people have the nationality of Argentina, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea which has recorded in 2003 and predicted for 2025 and 2050. While Argentina's and Indonesia's population is calculated to increase in 2025 and 2050, the population of Italy will decrease and Korea's population will grow very slightly.
The number of Argentines and Indonesian rises steadily as projected figures. While Argentina's population in 2003 is only 34 million people, this figure is predicted to grow doubly to 48 million in 2025 and 62 million people in 2050. Similarly, in 2003, Indonesia had 238 million people, this number will rise to 274 million in 2025 and 312 million in 2050 as the prediction. In contrast, the population of Italy and the republic of Korea will drop as the projection. This number was 54 million for Italy in 2003. It will drop to 47 million and 45 million people in 2025 and 2050 respectively. On the other hand, the number of Korean people was 48 million in 2003. This figure will grow slightly to 52 million people, then remain the same in 2050.
In conclusion, the number of Argentina's and Indonesia's netizens is increase significantly while Italy's population will drop slightly. This number is a litter greater in 2025 when compared to 2003 and the same as in 2050.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 56
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that governments should pay full course fees for students who want to study in universities Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73514293152 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424107142857 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0676538447 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172099738595 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078183792905 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04552526026 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128127299873 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414244435462 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90625 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73514293152 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424107142857 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0676538447 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172099738595 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078183792905 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04552526026 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128127299873 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414244435462 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.