The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table depicts the population of four countries which is Argentina, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea in 2003 and the forecast data of citizens in these four countries in 2025 and 2050.
Overall, the total number of inhabitants in Indonesia was the most of the four nations in 2003. It could be seen that this figure will still rank first out of the four countries mentioned above in 2025 and 2050.
In 2003, the number of populations in Indonesia was 238 million people, four times more than in Italy. The Republic of Korea and Argentina followed with 48 million and 34 million, respectively.
In the predicted inhabitant’s data in 2025 and 2050, Indonesia’s population will rise gradually and hit its peak in 2050, with 312 million people. The figure of Argentina will follow the same trend as Indonesia, from 34 million in 2003 to 62 million in 2050, surpassing the figure of Italy in 2025 and 2050. Furthermore, Korean Republic will increase by 4 million people more than in 2003 and will remain the same in 2050. Finally, the number of citizens in Italy will witness a declining trend, from 54 million to 45 million people, less than three other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 67
- The line graph shows the number of people who used different communication services in the world 73
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 89
- Some people think the best way to solve traffic congestion in cities is to provide free public transports 24 hours a day 7 days a week Is it good or bad to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85221674877 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63031123876 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492610837438 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5529800336 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17268024629 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880394250905 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675172064824 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129570650183 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549940738158 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.