The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and projected figure for 2025 and 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table depicts the population of four countries which is Argentina, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea in 2003 and the forecast data of citizens in these four countries in 2025 and 2050.
Overall, the total number of inhabitants in Indonesia was the most in four countries in 2003. It could be seen that this figure will still rank first out of the four countries mentioned above in 2025 and 2050.
In 2003, the number of populations in Indonesia was 238 million people, four times more than Italy’s inhabitants. The Republic of Korea and Argentina followed in the figure for the population in the four mentioned countries, with 48 million and 34 million, respectively.
In the predicted inhabitants data in 2025 and 2050, Indonesia’s population will rise gradually and hit its peak in 2050, with 312 million people. The figure of Argentina will follow the same trend as Indonesia, from 34 million in 2003 to 62 million in 2050, surpassing the figure of Italy in 2025 and 2050. Furthermore, Korean Republic will increase by 4 million people more than in 2003 and will remain the same in 2050. Finally, the number of citizens in Italy will witness a declining trend, from 54 million to 45 million people, less than three other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | tragiang0606 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | adamneyul | 67 | view |
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 84
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home allowing students to study at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- People in the community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'inhabitants'' or 'inhabitant's'?
Suggestion: inhabitants'; inhabitant's
...lion, respectively. In the predicted inhabitants data in 2025 and 2050, Indonesia’s popu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92488262911 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.679932947 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1035250797 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225898808896 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110795939406 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627627401737 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164048366721 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032762996023 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.