The table compares international tourism in 2009 and 2010 in 9 countries.
The given table compares how the status of tourism has changed proportionally in nine different countries over a period of two years 2009 and 2010.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Germany led the chart as it gained significant popularity in the tourism business by the end of the period after which China and Turkey follow the trend. Although almost all the countries experienced a positive upward trend, France remained stagnant, while Hongkong observed a reverse trend.
According to the given illustration, leading the table in 2010, Germany witnessed a dramatic surge of tourists as the number grew from 10 in 2009 to 24 in the following year. With the highest percentage change of 109, Germany topped among all the countries in the given list. Also, China and Turkey grabbed the visitor's attention. The former recorded 55% tourism growth(22 climbed to 34), while the latter observed nearly one-third of the total percentage change. Rest of the countries: the USA, Spain, UK, Italy recorded a relatively less percentage growth(1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, 2.3%) respectively.
On the other hand, the number of tourists remained unchanged in France, who leveled off at 76 in both the years. However, Hongkong noticed a reverse trend as the graph saw a negative behavior with the passing time(10 in 2009 down to 9 in 2010).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scotland in 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...ist. Also, China and Turkey grabbed the visitors attention. The former recorded 55% tour...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14932126697 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70744064453 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3532344563 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.8 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255515241532 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867379352346 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115596095646 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170546408648 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13735620831 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.