The table details the international tourist arrivals in million in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes
The table compares the number of foreign tourist who visited in eight different nations from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, tourism increased slightly in US, Spain, UK and Italy, but increased significantly in Turkey, China and Germany. By contrast, the figure for Hong Kong dropped drastically during the period shown.
The number of tourists in France stood at 76 million, remain unchaged in both years. The US rose by 1.5 percent from 66 million to 67 million people. In 2009, the number of tourism in Spain was the same as that of Uk, at 55 million, but UK overtook Spain by 1 million visitors in 2010. In Italy, there was a gradual change by 2.3 percent from 44 million to 45 million.
The trend for Turkey, China, Germanny and Hong Kong were noticeable different. The number of visitors chose Turkey and China changed dramatically by 33 percent and 55 percent respectively, In Germany, the number of international tourism changed highest by 109 percent during the same timen. The opposite was true Hong Kong decreased dramatically from 10 million to only 9 miilion and change -11 percent
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | songuyen14 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | minayoung | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Lê Thị Thanh Tâm | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | phg_phg | 67 | view |
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in million in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes 78
- Cyclist and car drivers sharing the same road causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 61
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 100
- The animals species are becoming extinct due to human activites on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'changed the highest'.
Suggestion: changed the highest
...ny, the number of international tourism changed highest by 109 percent during the same timen. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t by 109 percent during the same timen. The opposite was true Hong Kong decreased d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89189189189 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63484544492 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3489776822 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232588602547 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935706931174 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712300167925 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137527319275 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940146025383 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.