The table makes a comparison of the number of tourists in the UK and their average spending over the 5 years period from 2003 to 2008.
The table makes a comparison of the number of tourists in the UK and their average spending over the 5 years period from 2003 to 2008.
In general, the number of visitors in 2007 was higher than that of the remaining five years, while not only was the average spend per visit at the highest number in 2008, but the figure of all spending also showed the largest number in this year.
Looking first at visitor numbers, the first 4 years witnessed a moderate increase, from nearly 24.7 in 2003 to almost 32.7 in 2006. However, there was subsequently only a slight rise to around 32.8 in 2007. Interestingly, the number of tourists in the UK started showing a downward trend to 31.9 in 2008.
Moving to the average of total spending, 2003 to 2006 still witnessed an increment every year, from nearly 12 in 2003 to around 16 in 2006 before a decline from 2006 to 2007, to 15.96, but there was an increase after this year, to roughly 16.3 at the end of this period.
Looking at the average spend per visit, there were many fluctuations from the first year to 2005. The amount of money spent by each visitor went down, from 476 to 466 between 2003 and 2004. However, 2005 to 2008 witnessed an increase to 486 in 2007, only climbing by 1 billion in the next year and from 487 to 511 at the end of this time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | quochung95.ftu2@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- A highly controversial issue today relates to whether to supporting the relationship between enterprises and traditions from all over the world or not In this essay I am going to examine this question from both points of view and then give my own opinion 89
- In conclusion although some people are in favour of sharing academic knowledge freely I strongly believe that the government should enact more suitable policies in order to guarantee the benefit for companies and individuals 84
- The pie chart displays the changes in the proportion of water consumption and the bar chart illustrates the changes in the percentage of water use in Australia in 2004
- Generally speaking public transport represented the highest percentage of phone usage and family feasts recorded the least phone productivity Additionally elders relied on their phones less than others 84
- Governments should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erate increase, from nearly 24.7 in 2003 to almost 32.7 in 2006. However, there w...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the UK started showing a downward trend to 31.9 in 2008. Moving to the averag...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t there was an increase after this year, to roughly 16.3 at the end of this perio...
^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom 487 to 511 at the end of this time.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, so, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41152263374 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25195773823 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510288065844 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.6795437647 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462965536642 0.215688989381 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.222776124598 0.103423049105 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.281583938593 0.0843802449381 334% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344842226892 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.327839167144 0.0819641961636 400% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.