The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
The US 9.7 10.5 13.5 18 22.7
EU countries 3.3 3.4 3.8 3.7 4.0
Other countries 2.7 2.9 3.1 2.6 3.3
Total 15.7 16.8 20.4 24.3 30
(billions of US dollars)
The table illustrates how much money was collected by charities in the US, EU and other countries to aid technology development in poor countries in the period between 2006 and 2010, measured in US dollars.
It is clear that the amount of money donated by the US residents was highest and increased gradually/ incrementally over the surveyed/ observed time span.
To be specific, in the US, the amount of financial support transferred to developing countries to promote technology was 9.7 billion in 2006, going up to 10.5 billion in the following year. The figure nearly doubled in 2010, to 22.7 billion, which was the highest number shown on the table for single-country funds.
Europe and other countries shared a relatively similar pattern. The former experienced a slight growth from 3.3 to 3.8 billion between 2006 and 2008, followed by an insignificant drop to 3.7 billion in 2009, before a rise in 2010 to 4.0 billion. Meanwhile, the aid of the latter was slightly lower, fluctuating between 2.7 and 3.3 billion during the same period.
The total donations also climbed up steadily from 15.7 in 2006 to 30 billion in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | wardiati | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | khoavodoj | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | oxfordpro111 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-10 | JennieD | 67 | view |
- People should follow customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010.20062007200820092010The US9.710.513.51822.7EU countries3.33.43.83.74.0Other countries2.72.93.12.63.3Tot 78
- In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a negative or positive development? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98421052632 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80611224437 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9438147731 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244815289179 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112764742091 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921656929915 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145715311094 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102224956278 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.