The table shows the export values of various products in 1997 and 2010.
The illustration provides data on the values of the export of the different goods from 2009 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the overall export values witnessed an uptrend between 2009 and 2010. Besides, metals documented the highest growth in exporting while manufacturing hit the most significant decrease.
At the beginning of the period shown, the export values of equipment were highest at 10.38 billion HK dollars, making up for a third of the figure for the export values of overall turnovers. In addition, telecommunity accounted for 7.9 billion HK dollars in 1997, but that overtook the first position in exporting in 2010 with 11.6 billion HK dollars.
Between 2009 and 2010, there was a gradual decrease in export metals from 2.3 billion HK dollars to 5 billion HK dollars, whereas the opposite was true for clothing and manufacturing, between 6 and 5 billion HK dollars, 5.5 and 4 billion HK dollars, respectively. In addition, the growth of telecommunity was three times larger than the overall earnings, particularly 61%, and 20%.
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 67
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy 80
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by private companies rather than governments Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts show the sales of new cars in Australia in 1984 1993 2013 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88341028897 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.608213149 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190358062673 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110348398508 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718446870447 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148438881461 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623429202908 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.