The table illustrates the amount of forest area in six continents, namely Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania and South America in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
Overall, Europe and Asia experienced upward trends during the period of time shown. In addition, Europe and South America accounted for the largest amount of forest land.
In Europe, standing at 989 millions of hectares in 1990, the number of forests witnessed an significant increase of 9 millions in 2000, and reached to 1001 in 2005. Regarding Asia, there was also an increase in the forest land from 576 in 1990 to 584 in 2005 after moderately declining to 570 in 2000.
By contrast, the opposite trend was true for the other continents. In 1990, the amount of forested space in South America was 946, compared with 749 in Africa and 708 in North America. Oceania was even by far the lowest with just 199. During the next 15 years, the forest area fell sharply to 904 in 2000 and just 882 2005. Similarly, the figure for Africa saw a decline of 40 in 2000, and ended the period with 691. The forested surrounding in North America and Oceania slightly went down to 705 and 197 respectively in 2005.
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 84
- Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opini 89
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 11
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...rth America, Oceania and South America, during the course of 15 years, starting in 1990. Overall, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 54, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...pe experienced upward trends during the period of time shown. In addition, this part accounted...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '989 million'.
Suggestion: 989 million
...the same time. In Europe, standing at 989 millions of hectares in 1990, the number of forests...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...essed an increase of 9 millions in 2000, and reached to 1001 in 2005. Regarding A...
^^
Line 4, column 561, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing in North America and Oceania at the period of time shown, standing at 705 and 197 respecti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, regarding, similarly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64473684211 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3747600355 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4229004117 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0868534065704 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360583333293 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375893446701 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629296251262 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249719041788 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.