The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Write and Improve

Essay topics:

The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world. (Write and Improve)

The represented table illustrates how forest was grown in six continents of the world from 1990 to 2005, data are described in millions of hectares.
Generally speaking, Europe had more trees than any other areas, while Oceania stayed at the bottom over the period of 15 years.
It is noticeable that there was a slight increase in the number of trees in Europe, from 989 in 1990 to 1001 in 2005. Meanwhile, other areas saw reverse trends. Both South America and Africa, which were at the second and third place after Europe respectively, declined approximately 60 millions of hectares over the 15-year period.
Another point should be pointed out is that the forest area in North America, Asia, and Oceania almost remained the same after 15 years. There were around 700 millions of forest hectares in North America, which roughly 120 millions more than Asia. Oceania, at the bottom, had around 200 millions of Forest Area, which was just one-fifth of Europe after 15 years.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-09 tkbc1992 84 view
Essays by user tkbc1992 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '60 million'.
Suggestion: 60 million
...pe respectively, declined approximately 60 millions of hectares over the 15-year period. Ano...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '700 million'.
Suggestion: 700 million
... same after 15 years. There were around 700 millions of forest hectares in North America, which...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '200 million'.
Suggestion: 200 million
...sia. Oceania, at the bottom, had around 200 millions of Forest Area, which was just one-fifth o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40206522713 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0285597763 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146734340673 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664776327991 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686615636812 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893026018547 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678434869371 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.