The tables below gives information related to population growth, average birth per woman, life expectancy at birth in countries with different income levels in 2000 and 2004. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant.
The table chart illustrate about population growth, average birth per women and life expectancy at birth between high, middle and low income countries in 2000 and 2004.
It can be clearly seen that, the population growth in the high income countries was at +0.8% to +0.7% in 2002 and 2004. Whereas, the middle income countries remained same at +0.9% in both years. However, in 2002 and 2004 low income countries can be recorded at +2.0% to +1.8%.
The average birth per woman was remain constant at 1.7 in 2002 and 2004. Whereas, middle income group was almost same at 2.2 in both years, but low income countries was the highest at 3.9 and 3.7 in 2002 and 2004.
The life expectancy at birth was the highest in high income group at 78 in 2002 which was increase at 78.7 in 2004. The life expectancy increased from 69.1 to 70 in middle income countries and from 58.1 to 58.8 was recorded in the low income countries.
Overall, life expectancy increased in all groups of countries, whereas, the other two sectors was decreased or remained same.
- The tables below gives information related to population growth average birth per woman life expectancy at birth in countries with different income levels in 2000 and 2004 Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant 80
- In some countries the number of people using bicycle main transport mode is decreasing even though his so beneficial why is this so how can people be encouraged to use more bicycles 78
- The graph below shows the total births and the deaths in a European country from 1950 to 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and give comparison where relevant 87
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages. 73
- Some people think that university students should specialize in one subject While others think that university should encourage students to learn a range of subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...8%. The average birth per woman was remain constant at 1.7 in 2002 and 2004. Where...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73369565217 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34061266074 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445652173913 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0451682092 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303306069268 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170565969974 0.103423049105 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101648226964 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210686197695 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116148160465 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.34 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.