Task 1: The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots.
Given is the diagram delineating how to produce the ceramic pots.
It is perceptible that this is a linear process with multiple steps, which commences with unearthing raw materials and ends at manufacturing the ceramic vase.
Initially, with the support of diggers, clay is mined before being delivered to the factory by lorries. The second stage is that the material is crushed by separated machines to create the tiniest particles and short afterwards mixed with water in a mixer. The result of this step is a muddy mixture produced to prepare for the shaping phase when it is put into a mould. Subsequently, after experiencing a period of a 4 to 6-hour process of being dried inside the mould, the assembled clay pots are removed by disassembling the mould. Thereafter, they are heated under 1000 degrees celsius in order to harden, before being dyed by dipping in colored liquid. Ultimately, the manufacturing process of making ceramic pots is completed after these finished items in colours are fired again.
- The aging population is good for business the economy and society Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79232020982 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.630866785 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123487290512 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532416935669 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628066940164 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998744443782 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327984045455 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.