The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate the allocation of a certain UK school’s total spending in 1981, 1991, 2001.
In all three years, the greater expenditure was on staff salaries, although it experienced different trends. The expense on teachers’ salaries started with an increase in the first ten years. After peaking at 50% in 1991 from 40% in 1981, it was followed by a drop, before hitting 45% in 2001. The same situation happened to the cost of resources e.g. books, with increasing to 20% in 1991 from 15% in 1981, but falling greatly to 9% in 2001.
However, the amount of money on furniture and equipment began with an obvious decline from 1981 to 1991. After falling to 5% in 1991 from 15% in 1981, it was followed by a great rise, before reaching 23% in 2001.
The trend in other workers’ salaries was opposite to that in the expense on insurance during these thirty years. The figure for other workers’ salaries experienced a gradual decrease from 28% in 1981, through 22% in 1991, to 15% in 2001; by contrast, the data of insurance went up steadily, from 2% in 1981, through 3% in 1991, to 8% in 2001.
Overall, although the disbursement of the school was distinct in the three years, there was constantly the most money paid for the teachers and the least money spent on insurance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 47
- some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75109170306 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70322254714 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528384279476 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9093229963 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256638198635 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116048928848 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129786540271 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182863355095 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149285862736 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.