The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010

The maps illustrate the changes that were made to a city hospital’s transport infrastructure from 2007 to 2010.

It is clear from the map that there were three modifications to the hospital’s vehicle access. These involved the development of parking lot and intersection and bus facilities upgrades.

In 2007, staff and visitors used to share the mutual car park. It was located to the East of the Hospital road and people could access this car park via the Ring road. However, in 2010, the original car park served for staff only, and there was a construction of a new public car park to the East of City Hospital.

Looking at the other features, two three-way junctions in the South area of City Hospital in 2007 were knocked down to make way for two roundabouts in 2010. In addition, the Bus station was constructed opposite the staff car park, replacing three Bus stops on either side of Hospital road.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-07 ThHuong 78 view
2024-07-30 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-07-18 Ahmad_off 56 view
Essays by user newbie3107 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'Bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: Buses; Busses
...ite the staff car park, replacing three Bus stops on either side of Hospital road.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82278481013 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73036536912 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0516780927 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324389655868 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141169296012 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959414296066 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205480733601 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657292116747 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.