The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pictures illustrate the differences between the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and that in 2010.

In general, there are some dramatic changes such as the replacement of the infrastructures which are in front of the hospital as well as the construction of the new car parks.

Back in 2007, the city hospital was surrounded by a ring road linked to a road that directly conjoins that building. After 3 years of construction, people witness the launch of two huge roundabouts which is known as never happens before. Furthermore, surprisingly, both of the roundabouts are constructed linked to a bus stop station, making them looks like vertices of a triangle on a straight line which is the city road on the map.

Thanks to some teams that are responsible for these significant changes, residents of the city now have more space for parking every time they get to the hospital. It is due to in the past, the hospital staff and citizens had to share a small car park which was also used for some bus stops, whereas now they have separated parking grounds. There is one for the hospital staff located in the old car park and the other is once across the ring road from the east of the hospital for residents.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user LilyWD1814 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, well, whereas, in general, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64678899083 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6978288396 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545871559633 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.4191158093 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183992996442 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913645560294 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810201381523 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129224064163 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919767188904 0.0819641961636 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.