The two maps compare the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012
The maps illustrate how a school campus changed between 1985 and 2012.
Overall, the campus experienced significant changes during the period, the most important of which were the reconstruction of a car park and a playing field and the addition of school amenities. In addition, there was also a sharp increase in the number of students in 2012.
To begin with, the office in the north-west corner of the campus still existed while the library to the west and the smaller car park adjacent to it was demolished to make way for a computer room and a green space in the middle where trees were planted. The campus also witnessed the expansion of the classroom block into a three-storey building in the east of the school.
There used to be a rectangular car park in the north of the campus, but then it was redeveloped into a semi-circular one, which was accompanied by the removal of the path connecting to the playing field in the south. The playing field itself underwent a reduction in its size to build two more classroom blocks, swimming pool and a fitness centre.
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 78
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- MORE AND MORE CHILDREN IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING OVERWEIGHT THIS IS A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN WEALTHY COUNTRIES CAUSES AND EFFECTS OF THIS TREND 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7339545892 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547872340426 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1939023066 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242567822841 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130948586837 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155999593147 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197765943962 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179938610197 0.0819641961636 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.