The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrated the comparison of the percentage of online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Overall, there are the trend changes between 2005 and 2010 remarkably.
To begin with, in 2005 the most sector of online sales is electronics & appliance (35%) and video games as the nethermost (18%).
In contrast, in 2010 the trend had changed significantly, while the most sector of online sales had taken place by food & baverage which it reached 32%. On the other hand, at the same time the percentage of electronics & appliance sectors lean to degenerate more than 4% than previously. Furthermore, while in 2005 home furnishings sectors was positioned as the second rank of the percentage which it attained 25%, in 2010 it just gained 15% and was assigned as the last rank.
Finally, in 2010 the percentage of video games sectors gravitate to escalate tremendously which it added more than 4% and had succeed to uplift its position from the last position to the third rank.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | dolzoo | 67 | view |
2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 61 | view |
2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
2019-08-24 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
2019-08-16 | saadipk90@yahoo.com | 89 | view |
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information. Far from being beneficial, this is a danger to our societies. 11
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remainthe most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 73
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U.S. state of Oregon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...sly which it added more than 4% and had succeed to uplift its position from the last po...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...sly which it added more than 4% and had succeed to uplift its position from the last po...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, second, so, third, while, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95294117647 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72424256339 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547058823529 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7625605877 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 5.23603664747 265% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234798123242 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135096886 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15328068519 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171763180854 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143765905912 0.0819641961636 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.