You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given table illustrates the number of short-term migrant employer in four distinctive regions between 2003 and 2006 and corresponding worker-to--population ration in 2006.
Overview, most people from other continents had a tendency to migrate provisionally to the United States with the highest figure, as opposed to New Zealand which is the least-chosen countries for migrant. However, the ratio of these workers compared to the population of New Zealand was ranked as the leading position, while the figure for United States was the lowest.
In terms of the number of provisional migrant employers in the United States was recorded at 577,000 in 2003, which observed a minimal growth to 678,000 after 3 years. For the number of immigrant in United Kingdom, its figure witnessed a double growth in the period of 3 years, at 266,000. Turning to the amount of workers gone abroad to Australia and New Zealand was accounted for 152,000 and 65,000 and the figure of Australia in 2006 was approximately two times higher than the figure of New Zealand.
Concerning the comparison between migrant workers and the total population, in first place was New Zealand, with 21.1 workers per 1000 people, approximately double the figure for Australia. Considerably lower were the ratios for the UK and the US, both standing below 5.
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that this is the responsibility of governments to solve the problem What extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21860465116 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95747396345 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3232304521 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218928694887 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998640135402 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665864905467 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148064441029 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068195325875 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.