The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the amount of income for five different categories between 2015 and 2016. Overall, the value of petroleum products, engineered goods, agricultural products, and textiles had the same growing tendency, while the figure for germs and jewellery declined slightly.
Through two years straight, the gasoline products were the most valuable and kept increasing 3%. Following the petroleum was the figure for engineered goods, it had undergone a significant increase at 8.5 percent, became the second-highest value in 2016. Similarly, the values of textiles and farming products also witnessed the rising trend in 2016, with 15.24% and 5.18% respectively. With the percentage change in values of textiles, it had the most significant increase in one-year time. While, instead of the increase in value’s proportion of agricultural products, it remained to be the lowest value among the five genres, about 30% less than the highest one. In contrast, the gems and jewellery’s values had remarkably decreased by 5.18 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | hungnguyen2712 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words. 73
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, similarly, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 26.3917525773 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 160.0 206.0 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61875 4.54256449028 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03649031573 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61875 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 290.88556701 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.093411795 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.375 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 16.8248392259 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 4.34317383033 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156912776465 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739063692638 0.0766984524023 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626810289665 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123499939771 0.12726935374 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00193914142382 0.0580467560999 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 8.37731958763 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 70.7449484536 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 8.71597938144 176% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.