The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The bar chart and table illustrate the exported value of a nation in five kind of goods and how it changed from 2015 and 2016.
It is clear that there are increases in almost exported categories, except gems and jewellery. In addition, products of petroleum was the highest exported good all the time surveyed.
In 2015, petroleum and engineered products were the two kind of goods exported most, which accounted for over 60 billions and 58 billions respectively. The figure for gems and jewellery was lower, at over 40 billions. Around over 30 billions has earned from agricultural products exported, which was 5 billions higher compared to the figure of textiles.
The period from 2015 to 2016 saw the only slightly decrease in the value of gems and jewellery exported among five categories, by 5.18%, but remained at over 40 billions. However, the figure of textiles raised significantly fastest, by 15.24%, to about 31 billions which equal to the number of agricultural products. Furthermore, petroleum and engineered products saw the slightly climbs, by 3% and 8.5% respectively, to approximately 62 billions in both categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | hungnguyen2712 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | minhanh2410 | 73 | view |
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 73
- Nowadays many people cannot read or write What problems does this cause What measures can governments take to solve these problems 74
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
... the exported value of a nation in five kind of goods and how it changed from 2015 a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, well, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 937.175257732 103% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26086956522 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93687023173 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 290.88556701 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 1.44329896907 693% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.9679979509 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 76.5299724578 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 4.34317383033 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16091702828 0.216113520407 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747958409355 0.0766984524023 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903889968716 0.0603063233224 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130285082735 0.12726935374 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941097848427 0.0580467560999 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 8.37731958763 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.