Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single.Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. others disagree.
Discuss both views and you opinion.
"Working in an organisation teach us politeness, increase our patience level, enhance knowledge and skills". Sharing of personal information: hobbies, martial status are useful or not is an argument of debate. In my opinion, general information such as hobbies and interests can be shared in a professional sector but it should not on the cost of personal information such as martial status.
To begin with, there are some ratios of people who believe that sharing personal information with employer may be has a significant benefits. In addition to this, information like hobbies and interests are used to organize cultural events in an organisation which help to minimize stress, work load of employees. Moreover, working in a team for fun activities bring closeness among employees.
On the other hand, there are group of antagonists who believe that sharing personal information in a professional organisation does not relevant and useful. However, to make their argument more convincing they claim that women does not feel comfortable to share about their martial status. For instance, In a survey conducted by "Hindustan times", it has been observed that 50% of working women does not want to share their martial status because of ample of reasons. First, Divorcee women do not want to talk about their personal problems. Second, Most of the companies prefer single women because they reckon that single women will work with more dedication and enthusiasm.
In conclusion, as we have seen there are number of answers for the given question. Howbeit, I tend to believe that Personal information about hobbies and interest which produce stress-free environment while recreational activities should be share while applying job; marital status which brings complexity and prejudice in working environment should not be disclosed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Ankita7443 | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-22 | bkhatri | 67 | view |
| 2020-02-22 | bkhatri | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-11 | hivafara77 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | kayra | 72 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
... with employer may be has a significant benefits. In addition to this, information like ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...loyees. On the other hand, there are group of antagonists who believe that sharing...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shared'?
Suggestion: shared
...while recreational activities should be share while applying job; marital status whic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 3.85567010309 519% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 937.175257732 168% => OK
No of words: 287.0 206.0 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48432055749 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00684549633 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 127.690721649 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554006968641 0.622605031667 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 290.88556701 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 0.824742268041 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2311977699 44.8134815571 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.076923077 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 16.8248392259 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 4.34317383033 289% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230477152546 0.216113520407 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804517123145 0.0766984524023 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584913453405 0.0603063233224 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140129749906 0.12726935374 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300615108168 0.0580467560999 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 8.37731958763 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 8.71597938144 166% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 41.2886597938 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.