the graph below shows the quantity of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph depicts the amount of products which was supplied to UK by using distinct transport modes. The data is calibrated in millions.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, the large amount of goods was transfer by roads.
It can be vividly seen that, from 1974 to 2002, delivery of products through roads was increased with 70 to 100 millions of tonnes. Between 1974 to 1978, the amount of goods was less transport through ships. Further, the supply of goods by using water transport modes followed an increasing trend and reached at 70 millions tonnes.
Turning to rest of description, from 1974 to 1994, the use of rails was used for 34 million tonnes of products. Further, transport of products was rises by using rails with 40 millions tonnes. Between 1974 to 1990, the delivery of goods through pipeline was 15 million tonnes only but it escalating and reached at 25 millions tonnes in 2002. As far a comparison is concerned, the delivery of goods was doubled through roads compare to pipeline. Moreover, the figure of rails and water transport modes was same in starting years but it changed in the last year.
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 21
- some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. to what e do you agree or disagree. 56
- the table shows how many people used different form public transport in million between 2010 and 2014. 84
- some people say that subject like art, drama, add creative writing are more beneficial to children and therefore thay need more of these subject to be included in the timetable. do you agree or disagree. 56
- some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museum town hall and sporting facility is more important than renovation of the existing ones while others disagree discuss both views 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...The data is calibrated in millions. The most striking feature to be observed is...
^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '100 million'.
Suggestion: 100 million
... through roads was increased with 70 to 100 millions of tonnes. Between 1974 to 1978, the amoun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81725888325 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46014378735 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 127.690721649 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 10.0 0.824742268041 1212% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1935688605 44.8134815571 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2727272727 76.5299724578 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 4.34317383033 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.94845360825 203% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222681277713 0.216113520407 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951925305517 0.0766984524023 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699147811112 0.0603063233224 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138033412361 0.12726935374 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649361680431 0.0580467560999 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 8.37731958763 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 70.7449484536 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 7.45979381443 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 8.71597938144 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.