Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
The is vastly evidenced that famous personalities such as actors or sports players tend to get highly paid as compared to politicians. The most prominent reason is their reputation among the people which helps them earn more. In my opinion, it is a positive development and has a great impact on society.
To start with, the most justified notion for the celebrities for being wealthy is the countless fans that support them and follow time. They act as role models for most of the youth or teenagers and become the center of attraction hence, followers tend to do the same activities done by them for instance, wearing the same clothing, following the same hairstyle to doing good deeds such a helping poor. These celebrities are often seen in the advertisements which are for promotions or supporting inauguration of a new business. Apart from this, they socialize the business started by them at different social platforms and ask there fan to join or use the facility they are supporting. Most of the celebrities are brand ambassadors of international and national brands while illustrating themselves and adjoining them with the brand they increase their sales and earn a great amount of money for the advertisement.
The celebrities tend to collaborate and interact with various people on the online and get in touch with their problems and help them by understanding their problems. The more big stars earn money more they help charities, for example, the most recent one is a donation of 25 crores given by Akshay Kumar to the government of India during the Corona Virus Pandemic. The other personality such as Sushmita Sen, she has not got married and adopted orphan children to help them instead. Some other celebrities also pay high capital expenditure or charitable activities from providing food for poverty to establishing schools for children in deprived areas.
In conclusion, considering the point discussed above, the most conclusion to draw is that a celebrity’s reputation causes earn more money in comparison to the rest of the jobs. From my point of view, that is a positive development significantly in charity activities.
- You are unhappy about a plan to make your local airport bigger and increase the number of flights You live near the airport Write a letter to your local newspaper In your letter explain where you live describe the problem give reasons why you do not want 78
- You have recently learned about an opening for an internship at a local company that you are interested in Write a letter to the director of the company In your letter introduce yourself explain how you learned about the internship explain why you would b 92
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations 67
- A Piece of equipment you use at home for your work is causing problems write a letter to company shop Describe the problem explain how it s affecting your work and what would you like the company to do 73
- Wealth does not necessarily guaranty happiness To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 367, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...India during the Corona Virus Pandemic. The other personality such as Sushmita Sen,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 5.05154639175 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 937.175257732 193% => OK
No of words: 353.0 206.0 171% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11614730878 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94276605932 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 127.690721649 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558073654391 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 290.88556701 192% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.9645188998 44.8134815571 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 76.5299724578 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 16.8248392259 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 4.34317383033 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234113915894 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813814158948 0.0766984524023 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499942360217 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147391780684 0.12726935374 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204190862336 0.0580467560999 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 8.37731958763 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 7.45979381443 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 8.71597938144 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 41.2886597938 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.