In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in public and office places. Do you think it is a good rule?
There is no scope for any doubt that "Smoking is injurious to health ". Taking this into consideration, in some countries, the governments have enforced rules that prohibit people from smoking in public and office places. I believe this is a good rule for the following reasons.
First of all, smoking does not only play havoc to the smokers’ health but also the ones who are excessively and regularly exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. In fact, it is a scientifically proven fact that nonsmokers get more health hazards compared to the smokers. Various diseases like asthma, lung cancer, pneumonia, tuberculosis, stroke, and other heart and valve ailments are commonly found in such individuals. This is why banning smoking in public and office places is an effective move to preventing dangerous diseases.
Secondly, heavy addiction to cigarettes smoking can have a lot of adverse effects on smokers’ work and life. For example, smokers may neglect their work because they can’t resist the temptation to smoking. They may also be aggressive to their wives and children if they are not given a cigarette to smoke, causing family violence. More seriously, to feed their addictions, smokers may also get involved in social evils. To have money to buy smoke cigarettes, they may risk money on gambling, become robbers and other kinds of criminals.
In addition, smoking in public places like schools, parks, shopping complexes, beaches, offices etc. tend to develop a strong desire among young generation to inculcate this habit. To nurture a healthy young generation, we should support the idea that public smoking should be banned.
Last but not least, smoking has a lot of detrimental effects on the environemnt. The substances and smoke from cigarettes are supposed to contribute to the deterioration of the air. They may also penetrate water resources, entering aquatic ecosystems and become extremely toxic to fish and other marine creatures. Apart from that, if a cigarette is inadvertently left burning, it can cause a forest fire, destroying animal and plant species’ habitats and driving them to the brink of death.
Based on the aforementioned reasons, I believe it is a good rule to ban smoking in public and offices. This not only helps smokers to quit smoking but also ensures public health and protects the surrounding environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-13 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- Write a paragraph about the advantages of electronic devices in learning 63
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 84
- In some countries people are no longer allowed to smoke in public and office places Do you think it is a good rule 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... move to preventing dangerous diseases. Secondly, heavy addiction to cigarettes ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, apart from, for example, in addition, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 26.3917525773 182% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 937.175257732 213% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 381.0 206.0 185% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23359580052 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 3.78020617076 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85715761904 2.54303337028 112% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 127.690721649 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57217847769 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 290.88556701 212% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6804123711 166% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9294238558 44.8134815571 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9523809524 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 4.34317383033 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.29896907216 140% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.49484536082 669% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20986456714 0.216113520407 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639986110906 0.0766984524023 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070823260299 0.0603063233224 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120140804841 0.12726935374 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069944910905 0.0580467560999 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 8.71597938144 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 41.2886597938 257% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.