Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Climate change, which has a potential threat to our Earth, is occurring at an alarming rate. Some people suggest a flexible lifestyle with related risks. I completely disagree with this opinion because there is enough time for prevention and negative impacts are challenging to handle.
First of all, there are a variety of actions to reduce the human impact on climate change. Local authorities should provide regulations to reduce the carbon footprint by limiting factory production and vehicles on the road. Moreover, so-called ‘green taxes’ should be imposed on resources of pollution which can lead to global warming. As individuals, residents can participate in the eco-friendly movement by recycling and reducing household waste, planting more trees, commuting by public transport, and so on. Another option for us is to vote for politicians who propose to prevent natural disasters rather than who prefer to neglect them.
However, if human beings continue to turn a blind eye to this catastrophic incident, the consequences are unimaginable. On top of all, even a rise in sea level can cause chaos in our society. For example, it can result in torrential flooding, as a result, people living in low-lying areas or near coastal areas have to migrate, leaving their all properties. A month of this disastrous event can leave people with homelessness, famine, and outbreaks of poverty and diseases. It is certainly impossible for poor nations that lack finance and resources to cover the damage. In addition, reaching a peak in global temperature can also trigger the extinction of rare plants and animals.
In conclusion, the effects of climate change are coming closer with the rise in pollution, industrialization, and transport. Fortunately, we, humans, still have enough time to perform adequate planning and mitigations. Therefore, the responsibilities lie with both authorities and individuals to start doing precautions urgently.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane
- Some people say an urban city is a better residence while some argue that the countryside is Discuss from both points of view and give your opinion 84
- In many countries people are living in a throwaway society where things are used for a short time and thrown away What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment D 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'handling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: handling
...on and negative impacts are challenging to handle. First of all, there are a variety ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...o prevent natural disasters rather than who prefer to neglect them. However, if...
^^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls to start doing precautions urgently.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 32.9175257732 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 26.3917525773 171% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 937.175257732 178% => OK
No of words: 303.0 206.0 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49174917492 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08074450782 2.54303337028 121% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 127.690721649 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663366336634 0.622605031667 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 290.88556701 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.83505154639 163% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7239576651 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8823529412 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 16.8248392259 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 4.34317383033 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.49484536082 602% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139139896316 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407006564578 0.0766984524023 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447022061873 0.0603063233224 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911934992972 0.12726935374 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558047497279 0.0580467560999 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 8.37731958763 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 70.7449484536 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 8.71597938144 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 7.59969072165 133% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 41.2886597938 262% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.