The table shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.
The tabular chart illustrates the comparison of the global mobile phones sales in 2005 and 2006. Data is given in percentile.
Overall, in both years, people bought maximum Nokia mobile phone from share market where, less phones sold by BenQ Mobile company
At the first glance, in 2005,the sale of Nokia accounted for 32.5% while, in 2006 it accounted for 35%. In 2005, Sony Ericsson and L.G. Companies sold near about same mobile phone while, in 2006, in both companies saw 1% difference that was 7.4 and 6.3%. It was interesting notice that the 5% difference between sale of Motorola and Samsung however, 10% difference saw in same companies in 2006.
Probing further, the sale of BenQ mobile was 2.4 % in 2006 but, before this year it was double. 19.2% other mobile phone's purchased by people in 2005 as compared to next year. The sale of that phone was less than before that was 16.2%.
- Summarie the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The chart below display the percentage of the area and the current population of seven continent of the earth 77
- The diagram below shows the fire plan for the second floor of a student dorm building in a university 62
- Some people think that history is one of the most important school subject. Others say that in today's world, subject like science and technology are more important than history.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some countries have a law to limit working hours for employees. Why? Do positive or negative development. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun phones is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a mobile phone from share market where, less phones sold by BenQ Mobile company ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... less phones sold by BenQ Mobile company At the first glance, in 2005,the sale of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 750.0 937.175257732 80% => OK
No of words: 155.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83870967742 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26912211822 2.54303337028 89% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 127.690721649 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.622605031667 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 290.88556701 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 1.44329896907 554% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.07730757 44.8134815571 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 76.5299724578 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 4.34317383033 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29916494968 0.216113520407 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136717847714 0.0766984524023 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090797580581 0.0603063233224 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195664538627 0.12726935374 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363809264026 0.0580467560999 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 70.7449484536 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 7.45979381443 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 7.59969072165 96% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 41.2886597938 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.